Rankk.org Topic - 3/66

• 3/66

  Posted by Pha. Sphinx 6577 from on 2011-12-01 08:08:34

  Title: OOP
  
  Brought to you by combinat.
  
  Thanks and cheers to combinat!

  5 +votes | 0 −votes

  Huuuuuuu
• 3/66

  Posted by Geb. quangntenemy 1286 from on 2013-10-10 15:04:54 Reply

  I solved it but I think the challenge is a bit ambiguous. The result could be different if some values are defined differently. I solved by using the ones that made the most sense.

  1 +votes | 0 −votes

  quangntenemy.blogspot.com
• 3/7

  Posted by Scr. void 1 on 2014-01-03 18:36:08 Reply

  I know the solution but don't understand, in what form to explain it. Can you kindly give some hint concerning form (not the solution itself)?

  1 +votes | 0 −votes
• • Re^2: 3/7

    Posted by Geb. shortbreak 1614 from on 2014-01-03 19:38:41 Reply

    void, your post appears as a sub post for topic 3/66 when it should have "3/7" as the topic in the forum list.

    Attention to details... ;)

    0 +votes | 0 −votes

    536f6d6574696d65732069646c652c6e6576657220626f7265642021

    www.google.com
• 3/66

  Posted by Geb. witzar 14 from on 2015-08-20 16:36:23 Reply

  The challenge says:
  
  "Both OOP programs are valid except that some macros are missing..."
  
  If I understand correctly, I am supposed to provide some missing macro(-s) of my own invention in order to solve this. But if this is the case, then the solution can be just anything (I'm good at inventing macros!) and the challenge is completely ambiguous. Can someone confirm/deny this (I mean inventing macros)?

  0 +votes | 0 −votes