Rankk.org Topic - Fermilab letter.

• Fermilab letter.

  Posted by Nob. Intelos 175 from on 2008-05-20 18:31:45

  So has anyone else been looking at this?

  Partial solutions are tought to be found, but there seems to be some debate to it. Too easy or too diffuse. I'm not totally convinced either. If you got the brains to sit down and write this by hand, with some sort of resevoir or fountain pen, you're not going make a code where the cracker needs to assume an error only to get a misspelled result. It's already very elaborate and perhaps this problem is not beeing looked at right? There is always the offhand chance that its a double, beeing decoded into two seperate solutions through different methods.

  Then again, i'm prone to see too much and actually consider conspiracy theories.

  What gives?

   

  edit: Forgot to link: http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/05/15/code-crackers-wanted/

  Last edited on 2008-05-20 18:35:34 by Nob. Intelos

  11 +votes | 0 −votes
• Fermilab letter.

  Posted by Geb. shortbreak 1613 from on 2008-05-21 01:09:24 Reply

  I took a quick look a couple of days ago. The only thing I know for sure is that there is something to be learned from following the thread. "Fravia's Riddle" was like that.

  6 +votes | 0 −votes

  536f6d6574696d65732069646c652c6e6576657220626f7265642021

  www.google.com
• • Re^2: As an example

    Posted by Geb. shortbreak 1613 from on 2008-05-21 09:44:29 Reply

    http://www.gmilburn.ca/2008/05/17/fermilabs-strange-letter-progress/

    There are links from there to some useful Perl code < who knows where it could be useful ? ;>

    and an astronomical site which ... well check it out.

    The journey more than the destination ;)

    7 +votes | 0 −votes

    536f6d6574696d65732069646c652c6e6576657220626f7265642021

    www.google.com